Heuristic-Based Weak Learning for Moral Decision-Making

05/05/2020
by   Ryan Steed, et al.
12

As automation proliferates and algorithms become increasingly responsible for high-stakes decision-making, AI agents face moral dilemmas in fields ranging from market design to robots. Prior approaches to automated moral decision-making utilize either rules-based game theoretic models or machine learning models trained on crowd-sourced data. But rules-based systems are difficult to adapt to new moral dilemmas and data, and sourcing high quality, representative, hand-labeled data for machine learning is costly and even harmful if the labels are biased. To lower the barrier to training moral agents, I develop a heuristic-based weak learning approach to moral decision-making. My approach synthesizes potentially conflicting legal, philosophical, and domain-specific heuristics to inexpensively and automatically label training data for moral dilemmas. Rather than attempting to survey a representative sample of users who may be unable to make informed decisions about complex dilemmas, this approach relies on a smaller sample of domain experts. By writing heuristic functions over the dataset, these experts efficiently specify ethical principles for technical dilemmas. Weak learning paves the way to a ubiquitous, transparent method for instilling moral decision-making in the machine learning pipeline. I test this approach in two case studies for which there is publicly available data on people's moral preferences: 1) the Moral Machine trolley problem, in which an autonomous vehicle must choose to save only one group of characters; 2) a kidney exchange, in which a market clearing algorithm must choose between two potential matches for a donor kidney. I find that in these domains, heuristic-based weak learning is quicker and easier than fully supervised learning and achieves comparable performance.

READ FULL TEXT

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset