How Likely A Coalition of Voters Can Influence A Large Election?
share
For centuries, it has been widely believed that the influence of a small coalition of voters is negligible in a large election. Consequently, there is a large body of literature on characterizing the asymptotic likelihood for an election to be influence, especially by the manipulation of a single voter, establishing an O(1/√(n)) upper bound and an Ω(1/n^67) lower bound for many commonly studied voting rules under the i.i.d. uniform distribution, known as Impartial Culture (IC) in social choice, where n is the number is voters. In this paper, we extend previous studies in three aspects: (1) we consider a more general and realistic semi-random model that resembles the model in smoothed analysis, (2) we consider many coalitional influence problems, including coalitional manipulation, margin of victory, and various vote controls and bribery, and (3) we consider arbitrary and variable coalition size B. Our main theorem provides asymptotically tight bounds on the semi-random likelihood of the existence of a size-B coalition that can successfully influence the election under a wide range of voting rules. Applications of the main theorem and its proof techniques resolve long-standing open questions about the likelihood of coalitional manipulability under IC, by showing that the likelihood is Θ(min{B/√(n), 1}) for many commonly studied voting rules. The main technical contribution is a characterization of the semi-random likelihood for a Poisson multinomial variable (PMV) to be unstable, which we believe to be a general and useful technique with independent interest.
READ FULL TEXT