Improving alignment of dialogue agents via targeted human judgements

09/28/2022
by   Amelia Glaese, et al.
2

We present Sparrow, an information-seeking dialogue agent trained to be more helpful, correct, and harmless compared to prompted language model baselines. We use reinforcement learning from human feedback to train our models with two new additions to help human raters judge agent behaviour. First, to make our agent more helpful and harmless, we break down the requirements for good dialogue into natural language rules the agent should follow, and ask raters about each rule separately. We demonstrate that this breakdown enables us to collect more targeted human judgements of agent behaviour and allows for more efficient rule-conditional reward models. Second, our agent provides evidence from sources supporting factual claims when collecting preference judgements over model statements. For factual questions, evidence provided by Sparrow supports the sampled response 78 than baselines while being more resilient to adversarial probing by humans, violating our rules only 8 extensive analyses showing that though our model learns to follow our rules it can exhibit distributional biases.

READ FULL TEXT

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset