Testing for Publication Bias in Diagnostic Meta-Analysis: A Simulation Study

11/22/2022
by   Paul-Christian Bürkner, et al.
0

The present study investigates the performance of several statistical tests to detect publication bias in diagnostic meta-analysis by means of simulation. While bivariate models should be used to pool data from primary studies in diagnostic meta-analysis, univariate measures of diagnostic accuracy are preferable for the purpose of detecting publication bias. In contrast to earlier research, which focused solely on the diagnostic odds ratio or its logarithm (lnω), the tests are combined with four different univariate measures of diagnostic accuracy. For each combination of test and univariate measure, both type I error rate and statistical power are examined under diverse conditions. The results indicate that tests based on linear regression or rank correlation cannot be recommended in diagnostic meta-analysis, because type I error rates are either inflated or power is too low, irrespective of the applied univariate measure. In contrast, the combination of trim and fill and lnω has non-inflated or only slightly inflated type I error rates and medium to high power, even under extreme circumstances (at least when the number of studies per meta-analysis is large enough). Therefore, we recommend the application of trim and fill combined with lnω to detect funnel plot asymmetry in diagnostic meta-analysis. Please cite this paper as published in Statistics in Medicine (https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.6177).

READ FULL TEXT

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset